from the hip

American newspapers, most notably New York Times, have now started to wonder why American consumers aren’t spending. And in the financial sector, stock brokers and real estate agents seem to expect that it will happen next week or so, judging from the advise they are giving. That really doesn’t seem very likely at this point.

Why do American consumers spend less?

Well. The financial system in the US is still not completely shored up. AIG just reported a loss of 25 billion dollars for the third quarter and will be receiving a 150 billion aid package. Fannie Mae lost 29 billion dollars. Circuit City is going down. Airlines are in trouble. GM and the whole American car industry is in deep trouble.

As for the overseas markets, most indicators are down there as well. Every time the numbers are revised, they get worse. Right now, according to Wall Street Journal, they indicate a deep recession in Europe as well. IMF (see figure) now assumes that 2009 will be worse than 2008 for the world as a whole.  For 2009   IMF predicts a decline in GDP in the advanced economies of 0.3 percent. If this happens, it will be the first time during the periode following the Second World War.  For the US IMF predicts a decline of  0.8 percent, and for the Euro-area 0.7 percent for 2009. So there will be little pull from overseas markets for American businesses.

Now, add to this that the banking system isn’t working, loans are hard to get, unemployment is on the rise and millions of jobs are threatened.  Consumer confidence is at the lowest ever.

Also, factor in a negative wealth effect. The positive wealth effects, the effect of people getting richer on paper when housing prices were rising, were key to the growth the last 5-7 years. Now this operates exactly in the opposite direction, and serves to limit peoples spending up and above the effects of other factors.

So, what does it mean?

So how likely is it that consumers will start spending in the near future? Not very. Let’s assume for a moment that consumer spending will continue as today for a while.

Consumer spending is down 30 percent on cars, and 3 percent on the average across all sectors. Consumer spending appears likely to fall next year for the first time since 1980. Perhaps by the largest amount since 1942.

If it stays the way it has been for the last three months for a full year, that means demand for goods and services from consumers in America will be down about 1200 billions. And, spending is still dropping. As well, demand from businesses is dropping. And, as I wrote above, demand from abroad is falling as well. And right now, American businesses have just barely started to adjust to these new numbers and levels. And this adjustment will mean more lay offs and more negative earnings reports. That is simply how it works. And it is hard to see any “quick fixes” that can act as a miracle cure and lift us out of this situation in the short term. Rather, the adjustments will have to work their way through the system.

As far as American consumers are concerned, I notice people using words like “lacking trust” or “fear” as reasons for the decline in consumption. These words suggest that consumers are driven by psychological factors, emotions, beliefs and sentiments. Such words, I think, are the wrong ones in this case. Right now, I think American consumers act very rational – markets are turbulent, times are getting harder, uncertainty is high, so the rational response is to buckle down, sit still and wait for the fog to clear up.

So, for the moment, and for a while, it is just going down, I think. We are nowhere near the bottom. I don’t think we will see new growth for at least 18 months.

That’s what I think.

See also:

• Yahoo Finance: Home values drop for 7th straight quarter
• New York Times: Best Buy Lowers Its Outlook for 2009
• Washington Post: Why GM Stalled
• Washington Post: Obama Asks Bush to Back Rescue of Automakers
• New York Times: A Town Drowns in Debt as Home Values Plunge
• Wall Street Journal: Indicators Across Europe Point to Deeper Recession
• New York Times: Jobless Rate at 14-Year High After Big October Losses
• Times:First full-year slump since 1940s, says IMF

A new study from Harvard University lends considerable support to what I have previously written here about the crisis in the US housing market. The study predicts that

housing woes will continue as the economy wavers from the sharp drop in home building, credit and stock market turmoil, and a slowdown in consumer spending.

The study also adresses the negative wealth effects of the current situation in the housing market:

“Further price declines will not only increase the probability that mortgage defaults end in foreclosure, but also put a tighter squeeze on consumer spending,” the report stated.

As well, the report states that if the economy plunges into a severe recession, housing demand could fall even further. Many factors seem to still point in this direction. There are a number of negative indicators:

American Express experiences late card payments increasing

House prices dropping

Consumer confidence still dropping

The oil price is still rising

And so on and so forth. At the same time, inflation is on the rise, and while the Fed now is expressing strong concerns about this, they have still not really adressed it. My sense is that they will soon have to.

Every day in American news media there are several commenter saying that the crisis will soon be over. And among the most positive are the real estate agents and real estate firms.

No wonder. They make most of their income when the housing market is bullish. But is it going to be up this year? Is it over? Is it really only a crisis in the sub-prime loan market and some associated financial instruments, so that all it takes is a few write downs, a reduction in the interest rates, and a little time, and then it will all be over?

Well. It depends a little on what you mean by a few write downs then.

An article in the Financial Times, entitled America’s economy risks mother of all meltdowns, refers to Prof Roubini, who states:

Step one is the worst housing recession in US history. House prices will, he says, fall by 20 to 30 per cent from their peak, which would wipe out between $4,000bn and $6,000bn in household wealth. Ten million households will end up with negative equity and so with a huge incentive to put the house keys in the post and depart for greener fields. Many more home-builders will be bankrupted.

So, yeah, if 4.000 to 6.000 bn, or something even near that, is a little. Or, compare that to the following from Wall Street Journal:

Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg, one of the most bearish Wall Street economists, says to look past the 1990-91 recession as a guide to the current downturn. The key difference: the depth of home-price declines.Mr. Rosenberg says in a note to clients that the current downturn is hitting more broadly than the credit crunch and real estate meltdown in the 1990-91 recession, which lasted eight months (as did the mild 2001 contraction). Home prices today are falling in 85% of the country vs. 40% during that period, he notes. When prices hit bottom in 1992, the inventory of new and existing homes for sale was at 7 months of supply. Now it’s at 10 months’ supply “with no improvement in sight,” says Mr. Rosenberg, who was among the first economists to forecast a 2008 recession. He sees average prices nationwide dropping 20% to 30% more, on top of the 11% decline since the 2006 peak.

And this, of course, is really the start of it all. Both talk about 20-30% drop in housing prices. That’s pretty substantial. And, this is when the negative wealth effect kicks in, because people that have lost 3.000, 4.000 or 6.000 bn dollar are not going to be spending quite as much as they did before they lost their money.

I think 2008 will not see any improvements at all. Rather I think we have only just begun to see the bad news of 2008.