from the hip

The Bureau of Labor Statistics today reported that 80.000 jobs had been cut in the US in March. While officials and even newspapers in the US seem reluctant to use the word “recession”, more and more indicators show that the US is in a recession, or extremely close to being in one.

In an article in the New York Times, Andrew Stettner called for an increased focus on the job market in the US:

“People have been focused on the housing crisis, and rightly so,” said Andrew Stettner, a policy analyst at the National Employment Law Project, “but now the deterioration in the job market should be demanding much more attention from policy makers.”

The job cuts so far in the US seem to be fairly consistent with the early stages of a period with a reversal of the wealth effect. According to Washington Post the distribution of job cuts was:

The numbers are far worse than economists were forecasting, and they solidify the case that a serious economic downturn is underway.
….

The report shows clearly how the problems in the housing and financial markets are rippling through different sectors, showing the deep interconnections between seemingly separate parts of the economy.

The number of construction jobs, which has been falling steadily for 18 months, continued its rout. That sector shed 51,000 positions, as fewer residences are being built.

Fewer houses mean less construction and building materials; the number of manufacturing jobs fell by 48,000, with some of the steepest losses among makers of lumber, drywall and other materials. Automakers also shed jobs. With their homes less valuable, Americans seem to be holding off on big-ticket purchases.

Consumers pulling back means stores need fewer workers; the number of retail jobs fell by 12,400. The steepest losses were in sellers of building materials and appliances, both of which are highly tied to the housing business.

The branches of the economy, of course, are not seemingly separate. They are visibly interconnected. Job cuts are most severe in construction and associated industries. Then there are wealth effect consequences in the auto industry and consumer retailing. Its logical and as expected.

As to the depth and duration of this crisis, this is what Ian Shepherdson had to say in NYT today:

Many forecasters argue that the economy will rebound by the fourth quarter, a view rejected by Ian Shepherdson, chief domestic economist for High Frequency Economics.

“We are in for a much longer recession than Wall Street thinks,” he said. “This particular downturn is driven by a rare contraction in consumer spending, and that is starting to hurt a broader range of people than those hurt by the mortgage crisis.”

In my previous post about the American recession I wrote about the structural causes of the current crisis. I stated that the housing market fell because it finally burnt itself out, after having been too hot for too long due to low interest rates in the US.

The fall in the housing market, which is likely to last for quite a while - I think well into 2009 - has another disturbing effect. It reduces the value of property in America. Thus, the wealth effect - everybody getting “richer” because the value of their houses and apartments have increased, and spending some of that newfound wealth on consumption - is reversed. Now there is a negative wealth effect.

A negative wealth effect means that this time increased spending will not be fuelling the economy and lifting it out of recession.

The effects of the reversal of the wealth effect are now slowly becoming visible in the US. Automakers are adjusting their sales expectations down:

Dismal Year Is Forecast for Car Sales

writes New York Times. And it doesn’t stop there:

Slump Moves From Wall St. to Main St.

In Seattle, sales at a long-established hardware store, Pacific Supply, are suddenly dipping. In Oklahoma City, couples planning their weddings are demonstrating uncustomary thrift, forgoing Dungeness crab and special linens. And in many cities, the registers at department stores like Nordstrom on the higher end and J. C. Penney in the middle are ringing less often.

… Many economists forecast that overall consumer spending will slip 1 percent for the first three months of the year.

“That’s a wow,” said Robert Barbera, chief economist for the trading and research firm ITG. “Outright declines for real consumer purchases are unusual.”

What is shaping up as the second recession of the 2000s is the product of declines in home values, which play a far bigger role in most Americans’ personal finances than the stock market. Households have borrowed against the increased value of their property to buy cars, send their children to college and add home theater systems.

What all the stories of declining demand point back to, is of course the wealth effect. And in months to come, it will increasingly be reinforced by imported inflation, making the crunch on the dollar increasingly felt by the consumers as well.

Indeed - all the charts for the US look bad for the moment: Jobless claims up, consumer sentiment down, housing starts down, retail sales down, industrial production down, dollar down. Meanwhile, the stock market will continue to be turbulent.

To me, it seems a rough ride is ahead!

More to come.