from the hip

The little, otherwise relatively liberal country of Denmark, known perhaps especially for its liberal attitudes towards pornography,  may well be one of the most control-oriented states  in the world as far as the Internet is concerned.

Since 2005, the Danish state has monitored everything everybody has been doing on the Internet. The Danish newspaper Politiken writes:

According to metroxpress, the state is monitoring everyone’s behaviour on the internet as a result of legislation that requires all user names and passwords to be lodged with the State and University Library and the Royal Library. The libraries file everything from children’s scribblings on Arto.dk to love letters and profile pictures on Dating.dk.
The technology is known as Internet Harvesting and the Net Archive currently harvests all Danish sites four times per year.
However, some news, dating and other social network sites are harvested daily, according to Eva Fønns-Jørgensen of the Net Archive at the State and University Library in Århus.

Code release
“Danish sites have a legal duty to provide access codes and we have been harvesting text, pictures and audio since 2005,” she says.
At the moment, researchers are the only ones allowed to see the extensive personal material grabbed through Internet Harvesting. But 70 years after the death of, for example, a person with a dating profile, all information comes into the public domain.

The thinking behind this is that people themselves have chosen to place materials on the Internet, and that once it is one the net it is publicly available.

So there we go. Public nudity and liberal rules about pornography. But Big Brother is watching. And letting others watch as well!

1984 has come and gone.

See also: Inventor of the Internet warns against ‘Big Brother’ systems that track the sites you visit

There has been inrest between the two “independent” republics in Georgia - Abkhazia and South Ossetia - for some time.  The conflict, says New York Times, has tensed considerably recently:

The recent violence has been the worst in the region since June 2004, shortly after President Mikheil Saakashvili of Georgia came to power vowing to reassert the country’s control over South Ossetia and another rebel region, Abkhazia.

Also a part of the bigger context of this conflict is that Georgia has expressed a wish to become a part of NATO. A move that is not very popular in Russia and it’s premier, Putin.

Now Russia has sent troops and dozens of tanks and armoured vehicles into the breakaway Georgian province of South Ossetia. Also, Russian fighter jets have been shot down by Georgia. Russia is claiming that it is protecting its citizens. However, Tbilisi’s pro-Western Government describes it as an act of war.

More than 1.000 people have so far been killed. This is a very serious conflict. The US is currently sending an envoy to the area. Der Spiegel writes:

European diplomats have been trying to maintain peace in Georgia with financial incentives and promises of partnership. But now that bombs have started to fall, no one in Brussels, Berlin or Paris quite knows what to do.

The Georigian President calls it a perfectly timed attack, and refers to the fact that the eyes of the world are on Beijing and the Olympic Games.

I have a bad taste in my mouth about this. To some extent it reminds me of Hitler’s Germany attacking Poland and excusing the attack with reference to unrest in the border area and transgressions by Poland. I guess we will shortly learn more about what exactly Putin’s reorientation of Russia entails.

I hope the continuation will not be the case as it was in the case of the Germany-Poland conflict!

See also:

• Der Spiegel: Is this the First War between Russia and a Former Soviet State?
• Times (London): Georgia says Russian tanks mean ‘war’ in South Ossetia
• Guardian: Georgia accuses Russia after jets bomb South Ossetia border area
• Der Spiegel: How the Caucasus Erupted
• Politiken (Danmark): En frossen konflikt

Paris Hilton is in Copenhagen today and for a few more days. She is apparently promoting her line of products (bags produced in her name by PH Europe, to be sold in more than 80 countries worldwide) at some fashion event in Copenhagen. She is together with Benji Madden, her rocker boyfriend.

And Copenhagen seems to love her. She creates chaos, says the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet. Especially the media are wild. They are all full of pictures and articles about Paris Hilton, and the TV-stations have shows going where Paris Hilton says “I love Copenhagen” (I think that is about all she has said, so far), and where spectators are interviewed about why and how much they love Paris Hilton.

It is all slightly insane. I mean, so far she hasn’t done anything, and hardly said anything?

I wonder: Will the city remain standing if she shows up tomorrow without her undies?

The price of oil has now reached a new record high (in US dollar): 129.31.

Some experts think that a continued belief in even higher oil prices among some American investment banks and hedge funds is a major factor in driving the oil price higher and higher.

Also, the new record high for oil has been cited as a major reason for the drops in the major European stock markets Tuesday.

msnbc/AP writes that:

The June contract for light, sweet crude traded as high as $129.60 on the New York Mercantile Exchange before settling at $129.07, up $2.02 from Monday’s record high. The imminent expiration of that contract, which ended with the close of Tuesday’s trading, created additional volatility in the market.

They see no reason why oil should not hit 140 dollars a barrel.

See also (for a little fun): The Coming Oil Crash (LOL)
An Overview of Oil Prices from DOE
The Oil Price Conspiracy

PS: For the record - I share the view expressed in the first of these postings - about the oil crash - that oil prices will crash. But not in the very near future, I think. And only when the dollar starts to rise against other currencies, and then as a function of the strengthening of the dollar!

The case about Josef Fritzl, the Austrian that kidnapped his own daughter and kept her in a small underground apartment, behind seven locked doors, for 24 years while he abused her both sexually and in other ways, represents, to me, evil in a pure, undiluted form. Not only bad, evil acts, but systematic, organized evil.

As the full extent of his actions has been revealed - the torment to which he exposed his daughter for almost a quarter of a century, raping her and fathering her seven children in that little cave - I have become more and more perplexed. How can this be? How is such behavior possible in our time and age? How can a man become such a monster? And at a more practical level - how could a thing like this go on in a civilized, well-regulated society for 24 years?

A man claiming to be protecting his family, but obviously also a man who knew this his style of protection was more than a little at odds with socially accepted forms of protection. While his lawyer may be able to see good things in Fitzl, I really do not.

We are starting to learn a little bit about his past. It sheds considerable light on the question of how he became the monster. It offers, possibly, at least the beginnings of a seemingly plausible psychological explanation for his monstrous crimes. The Independent writes:

In an interview, the sister of Fritzl’s wife, Rosemarie, a woman identified as 56-year-old Christine R said that Fritzl had been brought up by a single mother with an explosive temper who resorted to violence to control her child.

“Josef grew up without a father. His mother raised him with her fists,” Mrs R said. “She used to beat him black and blue almost every day. Something must have been broken in him because of that. He was unable to feel any kind of sympathy for other people. He humiliated my sister for most of her life.”

He grew up being systematically subjected to and controlled by violence. But even so, the case still makes me perplex. The reason is that Josef F. at the same time was so much more than a monster, in other settings, with other people. He was evil incarnate, but also a smiling, respected, and somewhat successful businessman who amassed a fortune of 4 million dollars or so.

Over the years, more than 100 people have rented rooms and apartments from him. Seemingly without having much of a clue as to what went on. Apart from one person, that is, who has admitted to knowing about sexual abuse. But he was scared of Josef F. and did not dare to report it to anyone. Also, it has become known that Josef’s brother had a key to the basement.

Lately, after the case has become public, we have also seen a number of old, unsolved crimes resurfacing. An unsolved murder, several unsolved rapes. So far, the ties to Josef F. are speculative. But it would not, I guess, be very surprising if they turned out to be real. According to Der Spiegel, he raped his own daughter in front of her his and her children. So why should anything be a surprise?

So there was Josef F. the beast, and there was Josef F. the family man, and Josef F. the businessman. Possibly Josef F. the murderer and rapist. The multiple faces of Josef F. And the smiling face with the evil behind.

The little we know about his background, so far, may perhaps begin to explain, partly at least, the monster. However, explaining how the monster could coexist, seemingly with easy, with the other faces of Josef Fritzl, is a bigger challenge.

More about this case:

The Independent: The Making of a Monster

No need to be surprised when a house of horrors turns up on a quiet provincial street

Josef Fritz in the news

New York Times: Austria Stunned by Case of Imprisoned Woman

Painting a portait of Austrian incest suspect Josef Fritzl

Guardian (UK): How many more of our missing are stuck in some underground prison? (Expert view)

‘Every little thing she did, her father would hit her’

The minister of justice in Norway has proposed criminalizing the purchase of sexual services. The law proposes imposing fines and up to six months in jail for anyone convicted of paying a prostitute for sex. The law is in line with a “Sex Purchase Law” passed by neighboring Sweden in 1999, which has been the subject of intense interest in Europe and elsewhere.

Justice Minister Knut Storberget said in presenting the proposed law: “People are not a commodity and criminalizing the purchase of sex would make it less attractive for human traffickers to look to Norway.”

I am not sure I like the law. I don’t really know how smart it is to criminalize people for buying sex. But at least that part of the law I respect. The part I have strong objections to, is the part that says that the law should apply to Norwegians visiting other countries as well. This is strange as a legal principle.

I mean, if a Norwegian drive a car at 160 km/hour on a German highway, this is legal in Germany but illegal in Norway. But people do not get punished for it when they return home to Norway. Same for smoking cannabis in Amsterdam. And so on. But now the government proposes that when a Norwegian does something in a foreign country that is legal in that country, he is to be punished when he returns home?

And, in addition to the very strange legal principle involved, there is also the almost impossible situation with respect to implementation. Are Dutch policemen supposed to look out for Norwegians buying sex, when that purchase is legal in the Netherlands? And the same in other countries, of course.

So, seems to me, the only people who will be punished for this are the ones admitting to have done it - some honest guys - and people who are informed about by friends that can’t be trusted or enemies, and then some few others more or less randomly.

To me it seems strange and not very smart to put in place a law that punishes the honest and rewards informers. Is that how the socialist government in Norway wants Norway to become?

The Danish newspaper Politiken has an article today that is a character analysis of the candidates for the post of Mayor in the great city of London. The next mayor will be either “Red-Ken” Livingstone, the current mayor, or the challenger, Boris Johnson.

Boris Johnson is described by Politiken as a popular, conservative party clown with a pronounced upper class accent. Johnson likes to participate in comedy programs on TV, and makes lots of statements that he later has to apologize for. Like the one about the population of Papua New Guinea being cannibals. According to the polls, he seems to be leading the race for the moment.

The other challenger, supported by Elton John, is a homosexual ex-police boss, Brian Paddick. Polls, unfortunately, indicate that he has no chances of winning.

Red-Ken is an admirer of Venezuela’s president Chavez and Cub’s Fidel Castro. He is known, according to Politiken, for having stated that President Bush is the greatest known threat to humankind.

Tony Travis, a professor at the London School of Economics, says that as people in the UK are so concerned with celebrity and personality, Boris Johnson has a good chance of winning.

What an election! Seem to me like the good folks of London will have to exercise their democratic powers by choosing among bad and worse.

Alternatively, if Politiken is wrong, the next mayor of London, whoever he may be, seems to have a slight image problem in Denmark.

Corruption seems to be everywhere. Now a corruption case is shaking little Denmark as well. On Greenland, it turns out that the Greenland Government (”Grønlands Hjemmestyre”) sold houses to politicians and top bureaucrats for roughly half their real value.

A legal report, by Nuna Advokernes, concludes that this practice was unlawful. Big surprise. The report concludes that the selling of public property to individuals has to take place at the real market value.

For a while the Government at Greenland sought to block the investigation. Now that it’s on the table, the opposition in Greenland demands the resignation of the sitting government.

They should.

Princess Diana is one of the biggest mythical figures of recent times. From the day it became public knowledge that she was dating Charles, Prince of Wales, everything she did or said was major news more or less all over the world.

People loved her. She was royal, she was a kind person, she was engaged in social problems and health problems, and she was beautiful. So, of course, the media loved her as well. Hardly anything or anybody sold stories like Princess Diana. Nothing or nobody could outshine her as a media story seller.

And the paparazzi loved her as well. A picture of Diana, at just the right time and from the right angle, was literally gold. It could be sold all over the world in no time. And so they followed her. Everywhere, always. In huge packs, like hungry wolves chasing for food.

There was a whole industry around Diana. Paparazzi, journalists, newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TV-stations, journals, charities, celebrities - they all wanted her and fed off her immense popularity. Naturally. That’s how the world works in our day and age. And all because people all over the world were interested in her, liked her, sympathized with her, wanted to learn more and more about her.

Any problem she had - in the relationship to Charles, with the emergence of Camilla, with men she met, lovers - also fed into the media madness that was the modern myth of Diana. And made it grow even bigger.

She was a myth. She to some extent became the myth. She was consumed by the myth, in the end. That’s what the jury in London, and the judge, really said.

And now the new inquest about how Princess Diana died is over. It has been huge. Here are some figures highlighting the scale of the Diana inquest:

2,931,300 - estimated number of words spoken in open court during the inquest - almost four times as many as there are in the Bible.

£10 million - the likely combined cost to the taxpayer of the inquest and the preceding Scotland Yard investigation.

20,000 to 66,000 - the number of landmines which could potentially have been cleared for £10 million. (Based on an estimate of between 300 US dollars and 1,000 US dollars per device used by the Mines Advisory Group).

This whole thing reminds me a lot about another powerful myth, that of President John F. Kennedy. That too is a myth still alive and going strong.

As with John F. Kennedy, I suspect Princess Diana will be a mythical figure for a long time to come. It doesn’t really matter what the inquiry concluded. There are still more conspiracy theories to be constructed, I am sure. More elements in the myth to be spun. More articles that will be written, about her, her relationships, what she did, and so on. And more books, more TV-shows, more movies.

Princess Diana is, for good or bad, a powerful modern myth that will be with us for a long, long time to come.

I think.

More stuff about Princess Diana:
An article from The Guardian on the multiple conspiracy theories.

Naomi Campbell is wickedly beautiful, extremely sexy, moves like a gazelle, has had a marvelous career as a model, but what a temper the lady has! One of the top babes of all times, and one of the wildest ones as well.

As the picture shows, she is quite a looker. But she has had several unfortunate tantrums over the years, some of which have brought her into contact with the legal system. The last one, on Heathrow, is said to involve some spitting. On a police officer. Previously there’s been throwing of a cell phone, some beating, some pretty verbal stuff, and such.

The last episode I can sympathize with. Many of us, and I count myself as one, have been angry, outraged, and harassed at airports around the world. By arrogant, not so service minded airport or airline employees and security guards. At least a dozen times I have been at my wits end and so angry I have wanted to hit somebody or something. But doing it is different, though.

The part I do not understand about this, is when she later has claimed that she was arrested because she is black. That part I do not believe. Spitting on a policeman would get anybody arrested, is my thinking. But I may be wrong.

Naomi Campbell has previously been taking anger management classes. They didn’t to all that much good, it would seem. Maybe it’s back to school for Naomi now?